• Signal forks can have unexpected behaviours like retaining deleted messages and also they don’t get updated at the same rate that Signal get updated.

  • Every couple of years I hear a story about hackers disturbing signal with backdoors, which would be impossible or very hard to be done If they blocked third party clients. (Ex: 1)

  • The amount of people who use third party Signal clients are very few anyway.

I saw what WhatsApp did to forbid modification of it’s app which works in stopping a lot of distributions, why doesn’t Signal do the same?

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldEnglish
    44·
    1 month ago

    As I said, a compromise here would be to have a client security certification program, where no other clients outside it would be able to use Signal.

    You mean running a trojan “as a mean of security”, similar to anticheats? Are you sure this is a good idea?

    Or if by “program” you mean having some allowed clients as opposite to only the official one allowed, it’s a social thing, not a technical one. So it still won’t prevent anyone from connecting with another client.

    • Dot.@feddit.orgOPEnglish
      41·
      1 month ago

      I mean having a list of allowed clients.

      As I said in my post, WhatsApp already enforce forbidding third party client and it seems to work well.

      I don’t see why wouldn’t Signal improve the security of their users by implementing this, while upsetting the very few users who use third party clients.