• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Intel is totally missing the boat honestly. Their mobile i9 with the built-in GPU can share DDR5 with the video card.

    You can put 96 gigs of RAM in a small form factor and load in a monster model. It’s not super fast, But it works, and it’s a lot faster than not offloading layers off the CPU.

    They should be selling nuk sized PCs with built-in graphics and 128 gigs of the fastest RAM they can put on the boards.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      IMO its not really “enough” until the bus is 256 bit. Thats when 32B-72B class models start to look even theoretically runnable at decent speeds.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Also that is a very low context test. A longer context will bog it down, even setting aside the prompt processing time.

          …On the other hand, you could probably squeeze a bit more running openvino instead of llama.cpp, so that is still respectable.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            text test. A longer co

            yeah, it’s definitely not good enough for user-facing work, but if I’m working on development for something like translations, being able to see the 70b output to compare it to other models, it’s super useful before I send it off to something that costs more money to run.

            9/10 times, the bigger model isn’t significantly better for what I’m trying to do, but it’s really nice to confirm that.