yesman@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agoRemember: the SUX 3141 Ti is 60% slower than the SUX 3141 Xt. because it's 5 years older and has no components in common.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1739arrow-down110
arrow-up1729arrow-down1imageRemember: the SUX 3141 Ti is 60% slower than the SUX 3141 Xt. because it's 5 years older and has no components in common.lemmy.worldyesman@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoYou still need to understand their naming convention if you plan on comparing hardware.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoIs it not still “higher better” at AMD? With the obvious X or “m”, but usually price reflects the specs when the numbers are the same.
minus-squarelorty@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThe only thing you should realistic understand from the naming conventions is relative generations and which bracket of price/performance the part targets. Assuming more than that is just a mistake.
You still need to understand their naming convention if you plan on comparing hardware.
Is it not still “higher better” at AMD? With the obvious X or “m”, but usually price reflects the specs when the numbers are the same.
The only thing you should realistic understand from the naming conventions is relative generations and which bracket of price/performance the part targets. Assuming more than that is just a mistake.