• LifeLemons@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Kind of looks like windows vista design. Also it is probably a best thing that linux be adopted by countries. Gives better control and can be used for variety of purposes

  • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Im just waiting for some capitalist to call Linux inc out for supporting the russians

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    EU backed distro is seriously missing from the marketshare considering even Turkey has its own Linux distro. I mean EU with all the pressure it gives to tech firms to behave fair, it’s strange they don’t fund a custom distro as an alternative to the Microsoft’s monopoly on the PC OS market.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      a custom distro

      …or just a pre-exsting one. Heck, they should just make it a point to support open source development.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Supporting existing ones where possible and adding private stuff or diatro specific stuff when it’s not is the best way to go. Like valve and arch.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And it’s not like every major distro doesn’t have a way to add custom repos to the stock package manager if they need to deviate from the disro’s stock repos for any reason

      • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        This. Just require all gov products and documentation to be open. (unless military and even then open were possible)

        Creating a new distro is not needed. Let users or nation gov bodies select or create as they see fit.

        • loics2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Just require all gov products and documentation to be open. (unless military and even then open were possible)

          This is the case for Switzerland, a new law was implemented a few months ago