Summary

Voters across eight states, including Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada, rejected ballot measures for election reforms such as ranked choice voting (RCV) and open primaries, despite a $110 million push from advocates.

The movement, inspired by Alaska’s 2020 adoption of these reforms, failed to gain traction, with critics citing confusion and doubts over RCV’s benefits.

Some reforms succeeded locally, including in Portland, Oregon, but opposition remains strong.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 days ago

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink.

    Many people are too uninformed to understand why RCV benefits them. Others understand that it’s liable to upset the status quo that they like. Between ignorance and malice, it’s not surprising that RCV is a difficult sell.

    • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      In Arizona, the RCV proposition didn’t pass because it was bundled with open primaries. The bill was mainly about requiring open primaries with only a small mention of requiring ranked choice voting at the end. I would bet a lot of people here didn’t even know ranked choice voting was on their ballot.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think it is more of a difficult sell because of all the political and financial opposition. Nobody outside the US considers systems with more than two parties complicated. Instead it is pretty straightforward. You vote a party and the party gets seats accordingly to how many people voted for it. It is easier than the whole swing-state electoral college bullshit. But looking at Baseball and Imperial units it seems Americans need things to be needlessly complicated.

      • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Quite so. Same with the uniquely American obsession with acronyms. I swear to god, everything they touch gets one.

          • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Nah fam, I didn’t know how much of a thing it was until I went to the states. Every time there’s a subject to learn in school or some new policy, it must have an acronym, bonus points if it also features a flow chart guide for dummies.

      • t_chalco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        On the financial front, in Alaska the RCV maintainers outspent the repealers 100:1, yet the bill to repeal vote barely failed by some 600 votes - triggering a recount.