• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t think the people still on X are going to be listening to the EU disease agency account.

    They should (as you say) go where the people are… Which is threads and BlueSky. Follow the crowd.

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No, they should be where no entity outside of European jurisdiction can influence their messaging.

      The EU commission has their own Mastodon instance. That’s how all public services should do it.

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I wonder how long until Xitter does this sort of thing to the EU Disease Information account:

        Community Note:

        Covid 19 is not real.

        I feel like that level of misinformation is now possible there.

        • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          This makes me want to invoke the remind me bot, but I don’t think we have one on Lemmy. I wager that we’ll see this exact statememt from fridge-chest when the US gets hit with the next wave of 'rona.

    • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The (ideal) most reasonable approach for public information organs, in my opinion, would be to use all the channels that are available - Mastodon, Bluesky, Threads, but also X for the share of people that can’t be arsed to move (or don’t want to, because the people and communities they care about haven’t). I’d even count Facebook, Instagram, Reddit among those channels, as much as I resent those companies, as well as Lemmy and the other fediverse services (I’m not super informed here), a blog, RSS feeds, maybe an email subscription service too, just to be sure.

      In fact, I think diversifying your presence would be a great thing in general - platform exclusivity is turning out to be a quite toxic and disadvantageous concept. Well, it has been for a while, but it’s starting to become more visible.

      The real restriction is of course the technical infrastructure and personell to maintain all these presences. You could use of a content distribution system that takes a picture, a long text and a short summary to generate appropriate posts for all these platforms, but you’d still need people monitoring and responding on the various platforms, ideally people sufficiently familiar with the respective culture to communicate effectively.