My question may have been rhetorical, but not disingenuous. I firmly and honestly believe people should have access to information to help them make choices. If you care about objectivity then you should provide some hard evidence to prove your point instead of just telling people they are wrong. Feel fee to try proving what kind of “agenda” I could have by beleiving in free access to information while you’re at it.

Yes people have the right to make shitty decisions. I’m sure you wouldn’t disagree that people should also have the right to know how their decisions affect them so they can avoid making shitty decisions if they so choose, right?

Unless it plays Xbox AND PC games I’m not even the slightest bit interested. Even then I’d still probably prefer the steam deck or whatever iteration of it exists in however many years.

Oh hey look more forced conservative propaganda.

Well they certainly won’t win, but I feel like they will try at some point.

So they’ve already embraced and now they’re extending. Give it a bit more time and they will start to eliminate.

If only it worked like that.

My understanding Is that they apply to importing goods.

Naw, they’re too big to be real.

All that proves is that voter turnout was lower this election, and historically republicans have an advantage when that happens, and would you look at that a Republican won. Go figure.

Because our system is broken af designed and manipulated by powerful rich rascists who don’t want to give up control.

Can do both because their stupid AI will probably suck more energy then those panels will produce.

The meme is literally correct. when you make an audio file into an mp3, it takes some of the sonic information that our brains are bad at noticing and just…completely removes it(to save storage space). if it’s a high quallity mp3 its essentially completely unnoticable. That’s why it’s psychoacoustic, it uses psychology to fool your brain into thinking it sounds better than it does, litterally.

Psycoachoustic is basically just a big word for taking into account how our brains deal with what we hear.

Also I’m not saying mp3 is bad, in fact I think the opposite is true. I think it’s good to think of it like being the .JPG of audio, you’re not getting the original quallity and that’s the point and unless you need to do manipulate that audio file and its a reasonable quallity then you likely won’t notice the difference.

Ogg vorbis (.ogg) is a better codec though IMO.

*edited for spelling and grammers