They could have stopped at any time, but once their three day plan failed, putin decided to engage in a money-burning competition against a group of countries with a combined gdp roughly 25 times theirs…
They could have stopped at any time, but once their three day plan failed, putin decided to engage in a money-burning competition against a group of countries with a combined gdp roughly 25 times theirs…
Agreed. While 3, VC, and SA were awesome, the shift in style made them so different they’re not really comparable.
GTA2 stuck to the top-down view that made the original game so much fun. And the faction system was pretty cool.
I really enjoyed VC and SA, but I found it a bit jarring that the character now had lines. I always preferred that he was a “shut up and do what you’re told” kind of guy.
GTA4 was fine.
GTA5 was a really nice tech demo that lacked depth in the gameplay. Great writing, though.
Well, with linux you get the option of sending mixed signals through the use of varying count of guns. I find 9 to be highly effective.
…with blyatjack and hookers!
If I remember correctly, NK generals inherit the medals of their father, so there’s probably a medal from the Korean war 70 years ago in there, as well as for any anniversaries thereof.
Previous job: Windows, because it was a company issued laptop. Plus a lot of the company was built around the MS ecosystem.
Current job: Linux, because I got to keep the perfectly decent Dell laptop when I left. I wanted to make sure I purged everything, so it’s running LMDE now. Plus, there’s not much outlook and teams stuff that I have to use.
I blame Daniel
Unusable in our case
No. Beegfs.
It is my firm belief that, given a proper pitch, ANYTHING can be sold at a profit.
Also, there’s rule 34: If a thing exists, it’s someones fetish.
I realized a few years ago that my GF inadvertently solved this issue for me: She likes registering for anything that provides a discount, so I use her phone number.
“Are you a member?”
“Nope, but my GF probably is…”, and 90% of the time I am correct.
And Speech is free money. Source: Skyrim
Some surface-level info while I’m waiting for my kids to finish the evening ritual: No need for an extra IP or VPS. You can host them all on the same IP and machine, provided there aren’t any conflicting port assignments.
In the DNS server, you can enter the various subdomains as CNAME pointing to the A record. The server-software is configured with which hostname it should operate as (For example, HTTP/1.1 has a Host-specification in the initial request, so that one server can host multiple domains on the same IP)
It should be noted that mail servers are indicated by an MX-record. And mailservers should also have a TXT record (SPF record) as part of spam prevention - some SMTP servers query this to ensure that your e-mail actually comes from you and not from someone spoofing the domain.
I used to have a zone file that did roughly what you’re trying to do, bit sadly I don’t have it anymore. But as you have DNS up and running, I’m sure you’ll be able to figure out the rest through checking some examples.
I half-baked an example zone file for you. I haven’t tested it, though. It assumes the domain of blargh.com being hosted from an IP of 123.123.123.123:
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA ns1.blargh.com. admin.blargh.com. (
2024102102 ; Serial (incremented)
3600 ; Refresh
1800 ; Retry
1209600 ; Expire
86400 ; Minimum TTL
)
; Name servers
@ IN NS ns1.blargh.com.
@ IN NS ns2.blargh.com.
; A Records
@ IN A 123.123.123.123
ns1 IN A 123.123.123.123
ns2 IN A 123.123.123.123
; CNAME Records
mail IN CNAME blargh.com.
mastodon IN CNAME blargh.com.
matrix IN CNAME blargh.com.
; MX Records
@ IN MX 10 mail.blargh.com.
; TXT/SPF Record
@ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx ~all"
Oh, and some tips:
There should be such a thing as “preemptive discovery process”, because you know any evidence of this will be destroyed by the time the legal system reacts.
Or blame the deep state
Yeah, that movie was a perfectly timed parody of the War On Terror™. For a sequel to work today, the background must be changed.
Even Alex Jones is critical of Trump these days. He still considers him amazing and all that, but he says Trump doesn’t go far enough in some of the rhetoric. I’m curious to see if this is a litmus test for future defections
For someone who doesn’t care about any candidate, you seem to post an awful lot about them. How about posting something you actually do care about instead of shitting up everyone’s feed with whatever stupid thing she said he said?
Don’t hold your breath. .su is still around, so I doubt .io will disappear very soon.