That’s in theory. In practice it’s only used by liberals to insult leftist when they criticise the US or liberalism.
That’s in theory. In practice it’s only used by liberals to insult leftist when they criticise the US or liberalism.
Exactly this! I’ve never seen the term used by anyone but liberals to taunt, attack or divert a debate.
There is no chance it wasn’t meant to be an open world. The witcher 3 was a very successful open world they made.
Also, CP77 actually is in the style of elden ring that was praised for it, but CP77 came long before it. Most critiques of CP77 missed that part because the game doesn’t throw it at your face.
But then the octopus would be able to open the jar.
Well, if capitalism could tolerate true journalism, journalists would be paid like managers.
The problem is liberalism, something the boomers inflicted on us.
I wish it was, but it isn’t. It usually about them being able to ban you from playing for whatever reason they deem worthy.
The thing is that in a polarised world you support one side or the other, and the sides are the US and China. US is certainly not better deserving support than China, but liberals will call tankie anyone who support China in any way, shape or form. For a liberal it’s completely inacceptable to say that China is doing anything better than the US.