• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 days ago

    Just so people know the article actually doesn’t have any of that information but it looks like there are links and it talks about a document where you can learn that stuff more directly. They seem solid, just don’t expect the article to actually have the words.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I’m not sure why we’re concerned about legality, if we’re going to just roll over when Trump makes it illegal to fight fascism at all because “it’s illegal” then we deserve what we got.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 days ago

      There’s also the matter that fascists aren’t going to obey the law, they will not only wield the law like a weapon. Resisting them is going to be considered criminal regardless, so make it count.

    • solo@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      16 days ago

      You’re totally right, legality should not be a concern in cases like that.

      What I liked in this article is that it gives examples of actions on several levels, and I think this is important because a tone of things need to be done to effectively fight fascism in societies.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Good luck reading on mobile. They broke the cardinal rule: they messed with the scroll mechanic using CSS.