GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

  • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “their” is shorter than “his or her”

    (Even if you don’t care about gender inclusiveness, they is just more convenient)

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The best English literature doesn’t follow the basis of most convenient or shortest. Sometimes there are other reasons to choose a word of phrase.

      The plot of Romeo and Juliet could be rewritten in a paragraph but probably wouldn’t have had the same impact.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        True, but this isn’t prose or high literature. What reason do you suggest why “his or her” would be preferable to “their” in this context?

        The prescriptivist “It’s grammatically incorrect” argument doesn’t hold much water when it has been used since middle English.

        In a poem, I can see the thought:
        “I tried to fit the cadence of this clause
        Within the measure of this poem’s form
        Which has in past and present be the norm
        By which this poem, too, seeks to adhere.
        This is my authorial choice’s cause
        for my decision not to use a “their”.” But if to find an alternate way to word
        Your writing’s pronouns strikes you as absurd
        I nonetheless opine that you still ought
        To make the token effort to include
        With “their” all people by the same respect
        That you for yourself would from them expect.
        Refusing this, I feel, would be quite rude.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Comments here are a short form of writing, therefore people are allowed to phrase things and say things however they would like to. You won’t know someone’s intent before reading, so the way they write makes a difference.

              • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, of course, nothing wrong there. I’m asking what’s wrong with using “they” instead, given that there seems to be some pushback

                • Warchortle18@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I think the pushback is coming from that’s how the person talk and or wanted to write the sentenc. Why was it so important to you to tell him a different way to write his sentence?

                  • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I wanted to offer a suggestion I felt is better for two independent reasons. I didn’t say “you should have said”, simply wrote why I consider the more inclusive they more convenient too.

                    I don’t think there was any active “want” behind that way of writing so much as habit (“how the person talks”). Somehow a lot of people seem bent on opposing that suggestion though, and while I don’t want to make assumptions, I’m starting to think it isn’t out of some deep disdain for convenience.