• mtdyson_01@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not really surprising and honestly a little disheartening because traditionally Republicans usually vote on election day. Looks like another indicator that somehow, given all the information available on both candidates it’s going to be a close race. I’m sure Harris will win the popular vote but it’ll again come down to the swing states and the electoral College.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Swing state voter here voting on Election Day because I don’t want any stop the count fuckery to rob me of my vote.

      Not a Dem but sure as fuck voting for them.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article does correctly point out, for what it’s worth, that Republicans are trying to get out the early vote this year. Overall, it notes, Harris is 45%, Trump 44%. 52% Trump, 35% Harris on Election Day, approximately half of voters.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nope. Republicans vote early too. They have been moving to early voting Besides, Harris has this. Professor Allan Lichtman actually has a proven scientific method that works all the way back to 1860. He has arguably predicted the last ten elections accurately. He predicted a Trump win in 2016 - only he and another predicted person that. ALL the polls were massively wrong.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is no guarantee of a Harris win, and it may come down to a few thousand votes. People need to get out and vote!! GOP might pull another GW Bush v Gore on us, which would be even worse, so there can’t be anything other than ensuring voter turnout is high. Dems always win with higher voter turnouts, at least that’s what we’ve seen historically.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Most crosstabs in polling that specifically ask, “what single issue is so important to you that it will drive your vote?” or something similar, show that the single biggest issue (plurality, not majority) is abortion.

    I think women are going to show up. I don’t think this gamble with young men is going to match polling. Women as a group outnumber men, out-register men, and always show up to the polls in greater numbers.

    Last I checked Harris has a larger lead with women than does Trump with men, with a smaller population size to boot.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had someone come to my door to make sure I was voting, and they asked me what my number one issue was and I couldn’t pick one. They listed off things like abortion, the economy, foreign affairs, etc. and I still couldn’t pick. It’s all fucked.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Dems don’t just need to win the popular vote, and they don’t just need to win enough states to dominate the electoral college—they need to win by enough of a margin that victory cannot be snatched away from them by any kind of dirty tricks. No battleground state officials Chewbacca-defencing refusing to accept the vote and getting bailed out 6-3 by the Supreme Court, no Brooks Brothers Riot 2.0, no flood of bogus lawsuits delaying certification until the deadline passes and it falls on the House of Representatives to choose the President, and no other shenanigans they might come up with. Because this time, the apparatus is in place to steal the election if it’s at all close.

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I want to believe, but I just don’t see it happening. I live in a swing state rural area and I’ve seen easily 3-4x more trump signs in yards than I have in elections previous, and I’m livid.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been saying this for a while, but I believe it will be a large margin win for Harris and the democrats. I don’t believe a large portion of Republicans will actually go to the polls this year. They won’t bring themselves to go show up to the polls. The dems can push this hard and I believe more seats than the dnc are expecting will end up flipping to them.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. I honestly don’t know.

      Firstly, fucking vote. Don’t get complacent no matter what. Make a plan of how to get to your booth on the big day. A lot of media between now and then will try to make you feel like you don’t need to bother.

      That said, having consumed a lot of commentary about this, from organisations I think are reasonably balanced, I just have no idea what to expect.

      After the big day, it could be an outright shooting civil war, or Kamala could win in a landslide because republicans are too ashamed to vote, or Trump could claim victory and just get away with it. In any of those starkly different outcomes I’d think “well this was a really predictable outcome”

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        It all comes down to swing states. If it were popular vote then Harris would win in a landslide.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, that will decide whether Harris wins from a legitimate perspective, but Trump just isn’t going to concede no matter what happens.

          They’ve been wargaming how to foment uncertainty, and if they can find a way to do so in a state which is not a swing state they will do so.

          It’s very clear that if Trump does not win legitimately, he’s going to try to steal victory illigitimately, through manipulation of corrupt officials, through legal proceedings in friendly courts, and through civil unrest if need be. It’s exactly what he did in 2020, but with no preparation. This time round they’ve had 4 years to prep.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think its more the GOP and its posse of billionaires have been running the election theft playbook for four years. Trump never has plans, the people who are running things for him do…

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know, I saw a lot of Trump supporters when I voted today.

      I hope you’re right and we can get a big blue victory, but Republicans have always been consistent voters.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      She needs to win the swing states, not just win the popular vote. And that’s seems like a coin toss.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s where I disagree. It will be a clear victory. I was worried he’d win 2016. I was worried he’d win 2020. I’m confident he’ll lose 2024.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          So, you got some numbers for next weeks lottery please?

          I mean maybe he’ll lose, but who thought he’d win 2016? So maybe not!

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I though he could win 2016. When going for the first female president, you don’t want to put forward someone that so much of the country dislikes as a person. The only reason we have a trump anything is because the DNC rammed Hillary down our throats.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doesn’t matter. Get out and vote, america! And for all you other people, call america out for the bullshit that is it’s politics.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is early voting, not really a poll. People are interviewed upon exiting the polls and that data set is linked to the registration data for the precinct. So, there is no data model applied as there is in the polls you are familiar with.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            But, real data is used. There is not a turn out model of past elections. This is real people and real numbers being my point.

            Every time you vote, your name is checked off on precinct rolls. There’s no guessing on who has voted. Quite handy when it comes to GOTV

            • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 month ago

              But just because you vote doesn’t mean you take the poll. You can easily walk past or say no. It’s still a poll, yes it’s taken at an election facility, but it is not the same data set as the actual votes

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think the point is that this isn’t an advance poll to see how people might vote, where people might end up changing their minds. It’s instead people who have just voted saying who they actually voted for.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Gah! Why does everyone bring this up? Was no one around in October 2016?!

        James Comey, Director FBI, publicly announced they were reopening the investigation into Clinton’s emails, 3 weeks before the election.

        Liberals are always saying, “But her emails, hurr!” Yes, her emails. This was explosive news and handed the election to Trump. Doesn’t matter that Clinton later faced no consequences, all the public heard was, “Meh. Maybe she is a criminal. We’re having another look.”

        The polls were right, Clinton would have won if not for this absolute bombshell at the 11th hour.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    So a lot more people would vote Trump if the only thing that changed in their policy was the stance on abortion? That’s disappointing, considering the policies and the plan of Project 2025.

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s more along the lines of “more people would be apathetic” and just wouldn’t be bothered to vote.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That tracks. Trump has effectively vilified mail-in and early voting to reduce Republican participation.

    If he’s losing, his strategy is to undermine mail-in votes, attempt to characterize them as fraudulent, and get as many of them thrown out as possible. Even if he can’t get them tossed, he will claim that Democrats are using illegal immigrants and other ineligible voters to steal the election, stirring up his base for more extreme actions. He will point to the “impossible” Democratic bias in those votes as evidence of fraud. If those votes weren’t overwhelmingly Democratic, this strategy wouldn’t be as effective.

    Along with other tactics, such as challenging certification and having armed militias patrol polling places, this is part of his campaign’s multi-pronged approach to undermine the election if he’s losing, and they haven’t exactly been hiding their plans.