• Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      WTF? How can a CEO walk from responsibility by claiming puffery? Which is the same as admitting to lying!
      In civilized countries CEO is a position of responsibility, you can’t just talk up stock or sales with false claims. The requirements for a CEO are higher than usual, exactly because everything they say can have a financial impact.
      I’m pretty sure that judgement is not according to normal practices. It’s disgusting they let that pedo walk again and again.

      • SoJB@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Now you know why China DiSsApPeArS so many of them.

        Also known as fucking jail.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    if he gets over his fear of lidar and stops trying to do everything with cameras this could actually work out … so basically this isn’t going to work out.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What benefit would a lidar bring that they haven’t already achieved with cameras and radar? The car not seeing where it’s going is not exactly an issue they’re having with FSD.

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        a lidar could tell the difference between a person on a bus billboard and a person. it brings 3d to a 2d party.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          A lidar alone can’t do that. It’ll just build a 3D point cloud. You still need software to detect the individual objects in there and that’s easier said than done. So far Tesla seems to be achieving this just fine by using cameras alone. Human eyes can tell the difference between an actual person and a picture of a person too. I don’t see how this is supposed to be somethin you can’t do with just cameras.

            • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              No, and neither are your eyes, but you can still see the world in 3D.

              You can use normal cameras to create 3D images by placing two cameras next to each other and creating a stereogram. Alternatively, you can do this with just one camera by taking a photo, moving it slightly, and then taking another photo - exactly what cameras in a moving vehicle are doing all the time. Objects closer to the camera move differently than the background. If you have a billboard with a person on it, the background in that picture moves differently relative to the person than the background behind an actual person would.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Talk about making a difficult problem (self-driving) more difficult to solve by solving another hard problem.

                • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Just slapping on a lidar doesn’t simply solve that issue for you either. Making out individual objects from the point cloud data is equally difficult plus you’re then having to deal with cameras too because Waymo has both. I don’t see how you imagine having Lidar and cameras would be easier to deal with than just cameras.

                  Also. Tesla already has more or less solved this issue. FSD works just fine with cameras only and new HW4 models have radar too.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It will never be $30,000 or less. He did the same thing with the Model 3.

    You really just can’t believe anything this guy says regarding his products.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its name is still not clear. Prior to the event, Musk referred to it as both ‘Cybercab’ and ‘Robotaxi’.

    Couldn’t even decide a name and everything is 3d render. Add 3 years at least to the existing estimation. At least they didn’t have a toy rc as a representation, like their announcement of the robot.

    Musk said that Cybercab is equipped with Tesla’s AI5 onboard computer and based on a visual check, it appears to only use cameras, like Tesla’s existing vehicles.

    Gonna add another 1 year to it. Cybertruck didn’t even have full autopilot yet, and required the car to be babyseated. Steering-less car that only use camera for their autopilot is gonna be a disaster.

    • Draupnir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      A disaster using camera only for autopilot? Tesla FSD supervised has been successfully operating in consumer vehicles using cameras only for a couple years now. FSD software for the last several months has been performing phenomenally. If you take a ride in one it’s not hard at all to see how it could operate fully autonomously even within the next year.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        “successfully”

        Last time I drove one and tried it, it tried to ram me into the next lane over on a medium curve. It’s not great.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        A disaster using camera only for autopilot?

        A disaster for steering-less, unsupervised autopilot car. There’s a difference.

        If you take a ride in one it’s not hard at all to see how it could operate fully autonomously even within the next year.

        I’ve have faith before when CGP Grey simp so much on Tesla autopilot several years ago, but that faith waned so hard after several mishap and death. Yes, it’s gonna be fully autopilot like before, but it would need to be supervised as always.

        In the case of steering-less tesla, there’s no backup driver to prevent this.

        • Draupnir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Sure, I hear you, you’ve lost faith. Sounds like this happened over years which is understandable given the prolonged timelines and failed promises. What makes you think that the system will always need to be supervised? Any new technology can experience hurdles, but can you elaborate on

          several mishap and deaths

          ? Things may happen once in a while for a completely new technology involving vehicles and driving, but for the long term it is a necessary step to develop something that can save countless more lives. Chances are, you are either currently on, or have tried a drug or medication that has lead to numerous deaths and permanent disability during its workup and development. Did you lose faith in medicine and avoid it, or did you take the drug despite the incredibly rare risk of death?

          It seems that your attitude about the current situation was formed years ago. Definitely worth a second look and seeing for yourself, as the supervising driver, if you are not yet aware of the improvement and the current state of the software.