• phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really do wonder if Amazon will run out of people willing to work for them someday. Their approach assumes there is an infinite supply of workers to burn through. Given everything I’ve witnessed from the company, I’d never work there. Do they at some point poison the labor pool against them?

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it’s anything like my work and their RTO a few things.

    1. hR is well aware of attrition rates and I bet they’re through the roof
    2. Any new hires are probably not the best or brightest they could expect to hire

    So expect quality at Amazon to decline. It may not be outwardly visible but mark my words for those that are still there it will devolve into a chaotic shit show of overworked employees that are left backfilling work for those who left and the incompetence that came in.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Amazing.

    They order people to work in different offices than before, far away from before, or in offices that did not even exist before. They order people to work in offices who have only worked at home before.

    And they call it “return”, and everybody seems to accept the audacity.

    Nobody laughs out loud into their faces and calls them the dirty liars that they are.

  • omarfw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Now they can replace them without paying unemployment and pay the new workers a lower wage. This is what they wanted to happen. Mega corporations are a problem we need to solve as a society.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Quality programmers are a finite resource. Amazon chewed through the entire unskilled labor market with their warehouses and then struggled to find employees to meet their labor needs. If they try the same stunt with skilled labor they’re in for a very rude awakening. They’ll be able to find people, but only for well above market rates. They’re highly likely to find in the long run it would have been much cheaper to hang onto the people they already had.

      • omarfw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The whole problem with companies like Amazon is that hardly anyone in charge of them seems to care about long term sustainability. They all just invest enough effort to squeeze out some short term profits, earn their bonuses and then leave for another company to do it all again. Nobody is interested in sustainability because there is no incentive to. They’re playing hot potato with the collapse of the company.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the next executive’s problem. These executives will jump ship with their golden parachutes before any of that affects them.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      yeah, the only problem is that this results in the best talent leaving, you’re stuck with people who have nowhere else to go. it’s one of those short-term profits kinda things, which is why Wall St loves it so much.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s like reverse stack ranking. They’ll be left with the people that couldn’t find another job.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If Amazon don’t think that remote work is productive, then they don’t think they’re losing anything. I don’t even know how “stealth” this is at all. They must believe that those individuals could be productive, because they are trying to keep them working in office. I’m not sure why anyone thinks a company like Amazon would try to be “stealth” about a layoff anyway. They don’t need to.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just as planned - Amazon Execs who aren’t planning to rehire them anyway.

    They do this shit to cull you.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s sort of a strange approach, because this will leave you with the workers who can’t find employment elsewhere.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That was probably the intent. It works as a soft layoff. Do something wildly unpopular, knowing that a bunch of employees will quit. The ones left will pick up the slack, because obviously if they had anywhere else to go they would’ve left with the first group.