Summary

Republican senators are privately pushing to review Tulsi Gabbard’s FBI file amid concerns about her alignment with Russian interests following her nomination as Trump’s director of national intelligence.

Gabbard’s past support for Edward Snowden, who leaked U.S. state secrets, has drawn particular scrutiny, as has her history of echoing Russian talking points on Ukraine and Syria.

While GOP senators are publicly deferring to Trump’s pick, some, including Sens. Mike Rounds and Susan Collins, emphasize the importance of full background checks and hearings to address potential security risks.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Gabbard’s past support for Edward Snowden

    Yeah, Republicans WOULD be upset about her only correct stance, even if it’s a past one 🤦

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Quit being concerned quietly in private and freak the fuck out loudly like the rest of us, you fuckheads! Why do you keep choosing the most shit-filled route and then saying that the amount of shit you have to wade through gives you pause.

  • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    i love that he won’t even be in office for a couple more months and they’re already eating each other

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My thoughts too. I prefer non functional over fascist functional.

        Though it looks like people around him this time are expecting to be able to manipulate him and to have a real power.

        Another concern is that he likely replace Thomas and Alito with younger ones, basically cementing this corrupted makeup.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I could see Alito retiring for party over country but Thomas is too self-serving, he’d have to die to give up the free money position.

      • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        They had all three branches for two years under Trump starting in 2016 and only got the tax cuts passed, and otherwise dicked around.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Marco Rubio is on the Intelligence Committee, yeah?

    Dude wants to be Sect. Of State so damn bad he’s throwing all those Alphabets directly under a speeding Lada.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The Senate receiving every bit of intelligence on a nominee from every government organization should be a requirement. If there’s a national security issue with disclosure to the general assembly, that information should still go to the committees/Senators that have those clearances, like the Intelligence Committee.

    • incogtino@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Although FBI file reviews are standard for presidential cabinet candidates…”

      I don’t disagree with you, but this is a non-story. The committee asks for and receives this information as a matter of course