• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I used to be pro-nuclear and I am still not worried about the safety issue. However, fissile material is still a finite resource and mining for it is an ecological disaster, so I no longer am in favor of it.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As someone who isn’t well versed on the topic, is the impact from mining fissile material worse than the impact of mining the stuff we need for batteries and storage of renewable? Big fan of renewables, and not trying to start some shit. Trying to learn. Lol

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Batteries can be made from literal saltwater nowadays.

        Otherwise, lithium mining is certainly not exactly good for the environment, but can be managed. Uranium (even the non-fissile) is pretty toxic and can contaminate the whole area.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Once you use up all the heavy elements by fission you just put the newly created light elements into fusion reactors and get the originals back

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      fissile material is still a finite resource

      We have reserves that will last centuries, and it can literally be extracted from seawater just like lithium if the economics allow for it. Can’t comment on the mining impact, though. Is it any worse than rare earth metals?