They had no problems taking everyone’s money. Maybe companies should limit the number of sales when deploying a product tied to services they operate and need to scale.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    The peak concurrent users for the game thus far has been less than 1/10th of that (EDIT: slightly more than 1/10th of that). They were well within the bounds of what they simulated. They just screwed up.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah from what I hear, they kept the shitty self-downloader of the first one that is obscenely slow and counts as “playtime” because the game is open while downloading.

      This is on Microsoft, they can make as many excuses as they want, but they fucked it up.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No, that’s what I’m saying. That peak is well under what they claimed they simulated.

        • Album@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Peak concurrent was marred by the game not being playable. It’s not really a good indicator here.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            It is, because everyone trying to download assets from the game servers were doing so from the executable that Steam tracks as running.

            • Venator@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              You don’t have to buy it from steam, might’ve been more users from gamepass and xbox than steam?

              • taladar@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                It is a flight simulator, somehow I doubt it has more console than PC users. Consoles are just too limited to satisfy that particular demographic. Can’t even connect half a dozen different input devices to a console.

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  In classic Microsoft style, “Xbox” doesn’t necessarily mean the console. It’s also the name of their gaming service and the store you can use to buy games on Windows.

                • Venator@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Dunno what the sales for the new one are like, but the 2020 ms flight sim had a lot more mass appeal than any older flight sims, but maybe a lot of xbox players were put off by the pre download requirements?

                  Also when it’s on game pass the barrier to entry is a lot lower, as a lot of people might install it with the intention of only playing it for like 5 minutes to see if they can see thier house or something, which they probably wouldn’t pay full price on steam to do 😅

                  • Venator@lemmy.nz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    13 hours ago

                    But yeah it definitely sounds like thier test for 200k players probably had bigger instances provisioned than what they ended up using in the production release 😅

                    You’d think they’d be able to do some sort of auto scaling when demand goes up though… 😅

            • Album@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              It’s not, because downloading assets was not working, and with it not working eventually the user will shut it down thus having an effect on peak concurrent. It’s not even that complex. If people can play your game they will stay on it increasing the count, if people cannot play your game they will not, thus decreasing the count.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Exactly. The peak number of people trying to download it simultaneously was about 24k. They didn’t all stick around because it wasn’t working, even though that’s about 1/10th of what the devs expected and prepared for the demand to be. They didn’t get anywhere close to 200k people all hitting that server at once.