• fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So bi-partisan country-wide reform of how cases are assigned along with enforceable ethics codes banning partisanship that all states agree to so that federal appeals are not needed and a Supreme Court overhaul on top before we even attempt to do anything other than bend over for MAGA activists who are passing regressive shady bills at an alarming rate…

    Good luck with that.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And your plan is…

      Ignore the insane amount of partisian judges, both on the SC and junior courts?

      When do things in your version get better?

      40-50 years when they die off?

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Wow fixing the Supreme Court and court system why didn’t anyone think of that…

        Maybe Biden should have been appointing federal judges to balance out Trump’s appointments?

        https://www.brookings.edu/articles/can-biden-top-trumps-number-of-judicial-appointments/

        Maybe Democrats should propose ethics reform for Supreme Court? Maybe a change to term limits?

        https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-reform-biden-harris-trump-ffd48f3a2023aeca841bb53c2147ef03

        Unfortunately changes like this don’t happen with a magic wand and require pesky things like working around the inevitable House obstruction by winning the election and getting more House seats (otherwise you’d no doubt decry a Republican House blocking it as yet another doomed attempt by Democrats to change things).

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So your plan is ignore all of the corrupt appointments?

          Until when exactly? Just let them die on the bench in a couple decades?

          That’s not fixing anything, it’s ignoring the problem.

          Exactly what I’m complaining about. I’m just not sure why I had to say the same thing twice. Is it still not making sense to you that fixing a problem works better than ignoring it?

          • fluxion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Federal judges can only be removed by impeachment by the House of Representatives

            You have no plan and no idea what you are even complaining about.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Federal judges can only be removed by impeachment by the House of Representatives

              You obviously have no problem insisting you know more than me, but are you going to say you know more about it than Yale?

              Well, . . . no. Contrary to the orthodoxy, nothing in the Constitution mandates that impeachment be the exclusive method for removing misbehaving judges.

              https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/removing-federal-judges-without-impeachment

              Just because you don’t know something, doesn’t mean no one else does.

              • TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                To my knowledge there has never been a federal judge removed in anyway other than impeachment. You would have to take an untested claim to court, prove it, then still to apply that process to remove judges case by case after. Unfortunately, it’s not us that gets to decide whether or not something is legal, it’s up to the “supreme” Court. I just can’t see us convincing 6 of those justices to accept consequences for their and their party’s actions. This would be a hell of a legal long shot.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  To my knowledge there has never been a federal judge removed in anyway other than impeachment

                  And on 1/5/20, to my knowledge no sitting president had organized a coup to keep power…

                  The difference is this would be legal.

                  it’s not us that gets to decide whether or not something is legal, it’s up to the “supreme” Court.

                  Add 6 justices, that goes to SC and they rule expanding the SC is fine and has happened before.

                  Kick out the lower judges, if it goes to the SC, that’s fine. Because we’ve already taken back the majority.

                  I know you’re arguing against fixing stuff, but your arguent basically boils down to:

                  If we just try to fix part of the problem, it won’t fix everything

                  I agree.

                  Where we disagree is I want to fix everything, so it’s all fixed.

                  And you think we should fix…

                  Nothing?

                  • TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The difference is this would be legal.

                    There’s no difference with a broken court and we can’t fix that with our current Congress.

                    I know you’re arguing against fixing stuff,

                    What the hell are you on about about? Like actually what. You need to call down with that nonsense. Why are you being so combative? I’m not even the person you were first talking to.