The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The court’s order Friday, without any noted dissents, allows ballot preparation and printing to proceed in Nevada without Stein and other Green Party candidates included.

The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot in a state with a history of extremely close statewide races. In 2020, President Joe Biden outpaced former President Donald Trump by fewer than 35,000 votes in the state.

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    0·
    2 months ago

    The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot

    Seems as fishy as Stein’s intentions.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      0·
      2 months ago

      The outcome would either be a victory for the Democrats or a victory for the Republicans. So what part is fishy?

      On top of that, Nevada’s governor is a Republican.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        2 months ago

        Nah, keeping Stein on the ballot (for this reason) would be a win for our democracy. If there’s a credible case to formally accuse her of being a Russian asset and bar her from participation on those grounds I’m happy to see it go through. This is just arbitrary and authoritarian. I’m not okay with embracing authoritarianism to overcome fascism - there are better tools to beat Trump.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            0·
            2 months ago

            Yea, I’m familiar with the photo - that’s why I mentioned a case to formally bar her above. That photo could lead to an absolutely valid prohibition on participating in elections - so let’s go that route instead of bureaucratic bullshit.